1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2006 BMW 630
To start off, 2006 BMW 630 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW 630 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW 630 weights approximately 434 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 BMW 630 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 630. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2006 BMW 630 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | BMW |
| Model | Cutlass | 630 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 254 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2790 mm |
