1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2006 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC90 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,524 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 872 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2006 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
| Model | Cutlass | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 2198 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2870 mm |
