1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 223 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Chevrolet |
| Model | Cutlass | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1549 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1786 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2852 mm |
