1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 280 kg more than 2012 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Mazda |
| Model | Cutlass | 2 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1046 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1695 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2489 mm |
