1982 Oldsmobile Omega vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 1993 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Oldsmobile Omega (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Omega should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Omega weights approximately 230 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Oldsmobile Omega (183 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (107 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Oldsmobile Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Oldsmobile Omega | 1993 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
| Model | Omega | Clio |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
