1982 Opel Ascona vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 1996 Proton 300 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 300 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Opel Ascona | 1996 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Opel | Proton |
| Model | Ascona | 300 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2450 mm |
