1982 Opel Ascona vs. 1998 Xedos 6
To start off, 1998 Xedos 6 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Opel Ascona (115 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1998 Xedos 6. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Opel Ascona should accelerate faster than 1998 Xedos 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Xedos 6 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Opel Ascona (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Xedos 6. (138 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Opel Ascona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Xedos 6.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Opel Ascona | 1998 Xedos 6 | |
Make | Opel | Xedos |
Model | Ascona | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 154 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2620 mm |