1982 Opel Ascona vs. 2003 Proton Tiara
To start off, 2003 Proton Tiara is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Opel Ascona weights approximately 179 kg more than 2003 Proton Tiara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Opel Ascona (94 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton Tiara. (90 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1982 Opel Ascona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton Tiara.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Opel Ascona | 2003 Proton Tiara | |
Make | Opel | Proton |
Model | Ascona | Tiara |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2290 mm |