1982 Opel Ascona vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 379 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (150 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona. 1982 Opel Ascona has automatic transmission and 2011 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2011 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Opel Ascona will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Opel Ascona | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Opel | Volvo |
| Model | Ascona | C30 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1072 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2639 mm |
