1982 Opel Ascona vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 2,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (201 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Because 1982 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Opel Ascona | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Opel | Audi |
Model | Ascona | A6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 201 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |