1982 Opel Corsa vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Corsa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Corsa would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1982 Opel Corsa. (54 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Corsa.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Opel Corsa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Corsa. (90 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Corsa.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Opel Corsa | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Opel | Citroen |
| Model | Corsa | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1196 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
