1982 Opel Kadett vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2000 Smart ForTwo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Kadett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Kadett would be higher. At 991 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Kadett is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 30 kg more than 1982 Opel Kadett.
Because 2000 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Opel Kadett | 2000 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Opel | Smart |
Model | Kadett | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 991 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 1820 mm |