1982 Opel Manta vs. 2010 Audi A3
To start off, 2010 Audi A3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Manta would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Opel Manta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Opel Manta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Opel Manta | 2010 Audi A3 | |
Make | Opel | Audi |
Model | Manta | A3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2578 mm |