1982 Opel Rekord vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 278 kg more than 1982 Opel Rekord.
Because 1982 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Opel Rekord | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Opel | Mazda |
Model | Rekord | 3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1689 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1378 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2640 mm |