1982 Opel Rekord vs. 2013 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2013 Nissan Cube is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Cube weights approximately 194 kg more than 1982 Opel Rekord.
Because 1982 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Opel Rekord | 2013 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Opel | Nissan |
Model | Rekord | Cube |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1689 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1294 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2530 mm |