1982 Peugeot 305 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Peugeot 305. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Peugeot 305 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1982 Peugeot 305. (64 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Peugeot 305. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1982 Peugeot 305. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Peugeot 305. (96 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Peugeot 305. 2009 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 1982 Peugeot 305 has manual transmission. 1982 Peugeot 305 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Peugeot 305 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Peugeot | Mazda |
Model | 305 | 3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1288 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 96 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.6 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |