1982 Peugeot 305 vs. 2013 BMW 6 series
To start off, 2013 BMW 6 series is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Peugeot 305. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Peugeot 305 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 BMW 6 series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW 6 series (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1982 Peugeot 305. (64 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW 6 series should accelerate faster than 1982 Peugeot 305. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW 6 series weights approximately 895 kg more than 1982 Peugeot 305. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 BMW 6 series is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 BMW 6 series. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Peugeot 305, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW 6 series (447 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Peugeot 305. (96 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 BMW 6 series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Peugeot 305. 2013 BMW 6 series has automatic transmission and 1982 Peugeot 305 has manual transmission. 1982 Peugeot 305 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 BMW 6 series will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Peugeot 305 | 2013 BMW 6 series | |
| Make | Peugeot | BMW |
| Model | 305 | 6 series |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1288 cc | 2979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 96 Nm | 447 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 67.6 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.2 :1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4897 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1369 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2856 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |
