1982 Plymouth Caravelle vs. 2009 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2009 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 3,630 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Tribeca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Tribeca (252 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Tribeca should accelerate faster than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.
Because 2009 Subaru Tribeca is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Tribeca will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Subaru Tribeca (247 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (159 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Subaru Tribeca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Plymouth Caravelle | 2009 Subaru Tribeca | |
Make | Plymouth | Subaru |
Model | Caravelle | Tribeca |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3630 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 247 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2750 mm |