1982 Plymouth Caravelle vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo

To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Fiat Bravo (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 245 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Bravo (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Plymouth Caravelle 2010 Fiat Bravo
Make Plymouth Fiat
Model Caravelle Bravo
Year Released 1982 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2555 cc 1747 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 93 HP 128 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 179 Nm 180 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1190 kg 1435 kg
Vehicle Length 4760 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2610 mm