1982 Plymouth Reliant vs. 2005 Jaguar S-Type
To start off, 2005 Jaguar S-Type is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar S-Type weights approximately 470 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2005 Jaguar S-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar S-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Plymouth Reliant | 2005 Jaguar S-Type | |
| Make | Plymouth | Jaguar |
| Model | Reliant | S-Type |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2920 mm |
