1982 Plymouth Reliant vs. 2005 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2005 Toyota MR2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Plymouth Reliant weights approximately 85 kg more than 2005 Toyota MR2.
Because 2005 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Plymouth Reliant | 2005 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | Plymouth | Toyota |
| Model | Reliant | MR2 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2500 mm |
