1982 Plymouth Reliant vs. 2011 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2011 Ford Falcon is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Falcon weights approximately 554 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2011 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Plymouth Reliant | 2011 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Plymouth | Ford |
Model | Reliant | Falcon |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 261 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4955 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1868 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2838 mm |