1982 Plymouth Reliant vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Juke weights approximately 280 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2013 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Plymouth Reliant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Plymouth Reliant | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Plymouth | Nissan |
Model | Reliant | Juke |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1765 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2530 mm |