1982 Plymouth Trail Duster vs. 2006 Suzuki Forenza

To start off, 2006 Suzuki Forenza is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Forenza (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Forenza should accelerate faster than 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster weights approximately 550 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Forenza.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster (237 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki Forenza. (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki Forenza.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Plymouth Trail Duster 2006 Suzuki Forenza
Make Plymouth Suzuki
Model Trail Duster Forenza
Year Released 1982 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3678 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 237 Nm 178 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1615 kg 1065 kg
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1890 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2610 mm