1982 Plymouth Trail Duster vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 236 more horse power than 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster.
Because 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster. (237 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Plymouth Trail Duster | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Plymouth | Holden |
| Model | Trail Duster | Calais |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3678 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
