1982 Pontiac 1000 vs. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Pontiac 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Pontiac 1000 would be higher. At 1,817 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Pontiac 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1982 Pontiac 1000. (52 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1982 Pontiac 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 250 kg more than 1982 Pontiac 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Pontiac 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Pontiac 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Pontiac 1000. (99 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Pontiac 1000. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo has automatic transmission and 1982 Pontiac 1000 has manual transmission. 1982 Pontiac 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Pontiac 1000 | 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Pontiac | Daewoo |
| Model | 1000 | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1817 cc | 1761 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2610 mm |
