1982 Pontiac Lemans vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Pontiac Lemans. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Pontiac Lemans would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Pontiac Lemans is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Pontiac Lemans weights approximately 22 kg more than 2003 Volvo S40.
Because 1982 Pontiac Lemans is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Pontiac Lemans. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Pontiac Lemans | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Pontiac | Volvo |
| Model | Lemans | S40 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2327 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1438 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2670 mm |
