1982 Porsche 944 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Porsche 944. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Porsche 944 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1982 Porsche 944. (151 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1982 Porsche 944.
Because 1982 Porsche 944 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Porsche 944. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Porsche 944 (195 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Porsche 944 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Porsche 944 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Porsche | Ford |
Model | 944 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2479 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 57 L |