1982 Renault 11 vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 1996 Rover 400 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 11 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 400 (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1982 Renault 11. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 11.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Renault 11 | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | 11 | 400 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2560 mm |