1982 Renault 9 vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1982 Renault 9 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,220 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace (72 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Renault 9 weights approximately 402 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace.
Because 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Renault 9 | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
| Make | Renault | Simca |
| Model | 9 | Type 11 Monoplace |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 822 kg | 420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2250 mm |
