1982 Renault 9 vs. 1997 Renault Clio
To start off, 1997 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Renault 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Renault 9 (100 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Clio. (85 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Renault 9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Renault 9 | 1997 Renault Clio | |
Make | Renault | Renault |
Model | 9 | Clio |
Year Released | 1982 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 75.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 64.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2550 mm |