1982 Renault 9 vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 763 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Renault 9 | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | 9 | 75 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 138 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 822 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 65 L |