1982 Renault 9 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Renault 9 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | 9 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2490 mm |