1982 Renault 9 vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (221 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Renault 9 | 2009 Renault Megane | |
Make | Renault | Renault |
Model | 9 | Megane |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 138 km/hour | 236 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |