1982 Renault 9 vs. 2011 Hyundai i20
To start off, 2011 Hyundai i20 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Hyundai i20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Hyundai i20 (99 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Hyundai i20 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Renault 9 | 2011 Hyundai i20 | |
Make | Renault | Hyundai |
Model | 9 | i20 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 17:01 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 138 km/hour | 163 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |