1982 Renault Siete vs. 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 1982 Renault Siete is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 (104 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1982 Renault Siete. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1982 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Renault Siete | 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | Siete | Dove GTR4 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2140 mm |
