1982 Renault Siete vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1982 Renault Siete is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Renault Siete is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Riley Kestrel (53 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1982 Renault Siete. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 70 kg more than 1982 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 84 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Renault Siete | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Renault | Riley |
| Model | Siete | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2380 mm |
