1982 Renault Siete vs. 2010 BMW 323
To start off, 2010 BMW 323 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault Siete. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault Siete would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 323 (175 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1982 Renault Siete. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault Siete.
Because 2010 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 323 (230 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault Siete. (84 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault Siete.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Renault Siete | 2010 BMW 323 | |
Make | Renault | BMW |
Model | Siete | 323 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 84 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 78.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2770 mm |