1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche vs. 2010 GMC Savana

To start off, 2010 GMC Savana is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,748 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Savana weights approximately 122 kg more than 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche 2010 GMC Savana
Make Rolls-Royce GMC
Model Corniche Savana
Year Released 1982 2010
Body Type Convertible Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6748 cc 5300 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 0 HP 310 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2280 kg 2402 kg
Vehicle Length 5210 mm 5692 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 2017 mm
Vehicle Height 1500 mm 2073 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 3429 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]