1982 Saab 99 vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Saab 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Saab 99 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo V50 (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1982 Saab 99. (85 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1982 Saab 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo V50 weights approximately 298 kg more than 1982 Saab 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo V50 (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Saab 99. (147 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Saab 99.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Saab 99 | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Saab | Volvo |
Model | 99 | V50 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1438 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |