1982 Saab 99 vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Saab 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Saab 99 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1982 Saab 99. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1982 Saab 99.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Saab 99, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Saab 99. (147 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Saab 99.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Saab 99 | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Saab | Holden |
| Model | 99 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
