1982 Seat Ritmo vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Seat Ritmo | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Seat | Nissan |
| Model | Ritmo | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1196 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 92 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2640 mm |
