1982 Seat Ronda vs. 1991 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1991 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ronda. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Because 1991 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Seat Ronda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1991 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1982 Seat Ronda has manual transmission. 1982 Seat Ronda will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1991 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Seat Ronda | 1991 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Seat | Ford |
Model | Ronda | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 1991 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4690 mm |