1982 Seat Ronda vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Seat Ronda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 164 kg more than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Because 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Seat Ronda | 1992 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Seat | Toyota |
| Model | Ronda | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1992 |
| Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1910 mm |
