1982 Seat Ronda vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ronda. (61 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ronda. (88 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Seat Ronda | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Seat | Toyota |
Model | Ronda | Tundra |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1193 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 61 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 88 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3270 mm |