1982 Seat Ronda vs. 2005 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2005 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Sequoia (282 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ronda. (61 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1368 kg more than 1982 Seat Ronda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Sequoia (441 Nm) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ronda. (88 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Seat Ronda | 2005 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Seat | Toyota |
| Model | Ronda | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1193 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 61 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 88 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 67.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2268 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3040 mm |
