1982 Seat Ronda vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chrysler 200 (283 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ronda. (61 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chrysler 200 (352 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ronda. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Seat Ronda | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Seat | Chrysler |
Model | Ronda | 200 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1193 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 61 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 88 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4948 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2766 mm |