1982 Seat Ronda vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ronda. (61 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Because 2011 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ronda. (88 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Seat Ronda | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Seat | Jaguar |
Model | Ronda | XF |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1193 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 61 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 88 Nm | 450 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2908 mm |