1982 Skoda L vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,046 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Skoda L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru R2 (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru R2 weights approximately 9 kg more than 1982 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Subaru R2 (103 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Subaru R2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Skoda L | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Skoda | Subaru |
| Model | L | R2 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1046 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 103 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.1 mm | 56 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 66.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 834 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 30 L |
