1982 Skoda L vs. 2011 Ford Ka
To start off, 2011 Ford Ka is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Ka weights approximately 141 kg more than 1982 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Skoda L | 2011 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Skoda | Ford |
| Model | L | Ka |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1046 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 68 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 40 L |
